Working Thoughtfully with Mid-Level Donors
I am obsessed with thoughtful mid-level donor cultivation, solicitation, and stewardship. But then again we all should be. These are our best donors they give a substantial amount, and they do it regularly. They may not give as much as your major donors, but you can count on them year over year. But who exactly are they? Statistically, you can figure out who these thoughtful donors are based on a few basic data points.
First, and most obviously, their giving level. This level is specific to your organization. At one organization the range could be from $100.00 to $200.00 at another organization, it might be 250.00 to 499.99. It could be 1,000 to 4999.99 at another organization.
So the first thing you need to do is figure out what is your mid-level donor range. Segmentation is the key. I suggest that you look at your donors in two ways and then chose the donors that fit both ways. I recommend running two reports to figure out your mid-level donors. For an average organization, you can create a "consecutive years given" report that pulls people that give between $250.00 and $999.99. I recommend three years as the number of consecutive years. Then create a "total year's given" report. I this report look at people who gave in at least 3 of the last five years for the same gift range.
You should be able to figure out from these reports the cluster that contains the majority of your mid-level gifts.
Now to cultivate and solicit theses thoughtful mid-level donors. Cultivating and soliciting these mid-level donors is, actually, pretty easy. These people already like your organization and donate to you. What I would do is up my game on how I communicate with them. They should get a different letter from you lower level donors. It should be more personal. Now I don't particularly, mean merging more in formation about the donor into the letter. What you should do is talk more in-depth and thoughtfully about how their support is affecting your programming. Give them some specifics about how their commitment is changing lives.
Let them know they are important to you. Prepare a stewardship plan just for these supporters. This means going a few steps beyond just sending them a single thank you letter. What about giving them a call or writing them a quick note. Also, sending them material about your organization that DOES NOT ASK FOR MONEY. Not even a soft ask. These are important for the donors at the top of your mid-level range. That is how you move them to major donors.
Also, don't forget these supporters are great planned giving prospects as well.
They key are knowing who your mid-level donors are and treating them thoughtfully like they matter - because they do.
Catch up on your reading!
August is the ideal time to catch up on your reading. Here are some examples from our shared articles section.
What Counts and What You Should Count
I love counting things especially donations. But there are lots of other great things to count. First, you should count the number of gifts, number of donors, average gift, the frequency of giving, CPDR and ROI. But you can also count things like acquisition source, Package type, Personalization level and stamp/indicia type. Zip codes, age estimates, and rate of return by date.
If you have a robust, mature acquisition program, zip codes can be a great resource. At one organization after four years of running a traditional acquisition program, I started diving into my zip codes. First I ran a report that counted how many gifts I had gotten in the last three years by zip code. Then I look at just the top 20 zip codes. These were the ones with the most gifts in them. I was very surprised by what I found.
Now a couple of things were not surprising. The area around the organization's headquarters and the area around our biggest program had lots of gifts. No surprise there.
But, I could have hardly expected that in a single neighborhood nowhere near our programs I had a very large number of gifts. Not only were there lots of gifts but when I looked at gift history and frequency, these donors were really coming through for the organization.
I used a census tracking program that I found online to see who lived in that zip code area. What I found were single family homes, not a lot of kids and older adults. BINGO.
To test my theory that there were more people like the ones were already giving we did a carrier route presort acquisition mailing with personalization. What that means is that we mailed to 100k people who lived in the zip code area simply because they lived near other donors. We used are basic acquisition letter and made sure that the letter didn't just say "CURRENT OCCUPANT" but had the residents name on it. This cost a few cents more, but we thought it would be worth it. We could have tested and randomly sent some each way, but we preferred to err on the side on personalization.
How well did we do? When compared to our regular acquisition program the carrier route mailing did significantly better. Now should you just do carrier route and not use a more thoughtful acquisition program - nope you sure don't. This should just be one tool that you can use to maximize your acquisition program.
If we hadn't counted zip codes, we would never have known about a pool of great prospects waiting to hear from us.
EXTRA THOUGHTFUL IDEA
You should count people with old looking handwriting. Planned Giving prospects have to come from somewhere.
It Occurs To Me
Please leave a comment, thoughtfully.
* indicates required